Thursday, 5 December 2013

ToyTalk Isn’t Just Entertaining Our Kids, It’s Teaching Our Machines To Converse


Today the talking iPad app The Winston Show from ToyTalk gets two new scenarios based on classic movie genres. The skethc called In the Movies has a film noir segment called Winston Sly, Private Eye and a sci-fi jaunt called Squabble Amongst the Stars. We’ve covered ToyTalk before, but it continues to be fascinating because of the underlying technology. Yes, it’s a kids entertainment app for the iPad, but it’s created by talent culled from the Artificial Intelligence Center at SRI international (the company that spawned Siri) and Pixar, among others. The company has raised over $16M from Greylock, Charles River Ventures, True Ventures and First Round Capital and a number of angels. It’s using artificial intelligence and voice recognition to build a framework that’s working towards full-on conversational technology that will allow our machines to talk back to us. We talked to CEO Oren Jacob — a former Pixar CTO — about the latest update to the app. The two new episodes, he says, came about because kids seemed to really love it when they became the characters. The previous content in The Winston Show was focused on a ‘game show’ environment where the kid played ‘themselves’ on a show hosted by the eponymous Winston. He would converse back and forth with them using tons of dialogue written and recorded by ToyTalk, and the company’s AI engine to determine the proper responses.
The new episodes in the app use the iPad’s camera to place kids right in the scenes, allowing them to ‘become’ an alien themselves. This immersion helps them to place themselves into the scenario and be more engaged in dialogue. In the film noir episode, for instance, the kids take on the role of the suspect, and Winston grills them on ‘who made the mess in their room’. The kids can say just about anything back, and Winston either answers or fills in the blanks with noncomittal language. As ToyTalk gets the feedback from the app, it can see what the most popular responses coming in that Winston is unable to reply to and it can add in dialog to fill those gaps. In September, ToyTalk launched The Winston Show with around 6 hours of content, which translated to about 8-9 hours of gameplay. By January, it hopes to have around 12 hours of content for kids to partake in.
Jacob says that as they observed usage patterns, some interesting data points bubbled up. For instance, most kids used them on the weekends, with usage sloping up on Saturday Morning and tapering off Monday morning. And they used the app for around 30 minutes a week — which is pretty impressive for a single app given that the average is just a few minutes. Essentially, they’re setting aside 30 minutes of ‘Saturday morning cartoons’ for a conversation with Winston. One of the particularly interesting notes to come out of ToyTalk’s research in building the app is that the age group they’re targeting, 5-10 year olds, feels incredibly natural ‘talking’ to gadgets and services. When asked who talks to Siri, Google Now or apps like Dragon Naturally Speaking, nearly all of them try these things. “They do it for sport,” Jacob notes. For the next generation, speaking to a tablet or phone will be a matter of course. And having those devices not only hear and recognize, but also converse with us seems like an intriguing possibility. Even though kids are presented with touch interfaces young, they can’t type or spell, Jacob notes. But they can speak before they do any of those. There have been over 2 million things said to Winston, and ToyTalk is learning with each one. They use a proprietary technology called PullString to design a two-way conversation via animation, recording and the response process. The app is already popular, but the technology, the framework, is where the power of ToyTalk is, and what could eventually be the thing that it leverages for revenue. If, after all, our devices are going to talk to us, someone has to teach them. The Winston Show’s update is live in the App Store now.

Perpetu Lets You Decide What Happens To Your Online Accounts After You Die


One day each of us will pass on and be no more. We will cease to be, expired stiff and bereft of life, our metabolic processes part of history. Most of us don’t like to think about joining the choir invisible or, for that matter, what will happen to our online profiles once we become ex-people. A startup called Perpetu wants to make it easier for us to ensure that our social network accounts are unplugged once we shuffle off this mortal coil. The service, which currently lets users add Facebook or Twitter accounts for free, just launched its premium service, which costs $15 a year or a $100 one-time payment and includes support for LinkedIn, Gmail, Dropbox, Flickr and GitHub. How it works Founded by an intellectual property lawyer and banker, Perpetu allows you to decide what happens to your “online assets” after you die even if you don’t have a will. First, you sign up for Perpetu with your email, Facebook or Twitter account. Once you are logged in, you will see a list of services you can add to Perpetu. There are several options for each. For example, you can schedule a final wall post for your Facebook profile, or download photos, your status updates and private messages and have the files emailed to certain people. On GitHub, developers can select repositories to make public after they die. Your LinkedIn contacts can downloaded and forwarded to a colleague or someone else. Online privacy laws are still in their infancy and each social network has different ways of dealing with the information of deceased users. Unfortunately, their methods often conflict with the wishes of family members and friends. Co-founder Ryanne Lai says two cases in particular motivated her. In the U.K., a woman named Louise Palmer complained after her late daughter Becky’s Facebook profile was turned into a memorial page because she could not log on to remove spam or read the encouraging messages friends had sent Becky after she was diagnosed with a brain tumor. Several years earlier in the U.S., the family of soldier Justin Ellsworth sued Yahoo in 2005 to gain access to their son’s email account, where he had been drafting a memoir of his service in Iraq before he was killed by a roadside bomb. “The thing about the [Ellsworth] case that was really shocking to me was that on one hand I couldn’t believe how much trouble the family had to go through to get access to the emails,” says Lai. “But even more shocking to me is that the son may not have wanted his family to see everything. He had no control and there was no way to strike a balance.” Balancing privacy and access Perpetu seeks to respect the wishes of its users while making sure that their heirs don’t need to endure the lengthy process of submitting death certificates, obituaries and court orders in order to gain access to their online accounts. The company tackles the problem by letting you chose which files or folders to send to specific people, one of the main ways in which it differentiates from competitors.
Similar services include Legacy Locker, which was acquired by PasswordBox earlier this month, AssetLock and Google’s Inactive Account Manager. Other “digital afterlife” services include DeadSocial and LivesOn which lets you prepare messages to be published to your social networks after you die. Unlike Legacy Locker or AssetLock, Perpetu doesn’t ask users for their passwords. Instead, you select what information is downloaded and sent to your friends and family so they don’t have to log into your accounts and go through the potentially traumatic process of sifting through all your private emails, documents and photos. “That’s why I started Perpetu. I have a Tumblr. I have a fan Twitter account used specifically for tweeting to Adam Lambert,” says Lai. “These are things that I want to keep and that my family wouldn’t understand.” “For companies like Yahoo, Facebook and Google, they are not putting enough effort into dealing with dead users’ accounts. It doesn’t get them any more data. There’s no incentive for them,” she adds. “I appreciate Google doing an inactive account manager, but Perpetu has no conflict of interest.” Lai first pitched Perpetu’s concept at Startup Weekend Hong Kong in 2011, where she met co-founder Andrea Livotto. The two built a prototype at the event, then applied for funding from the Hong Kong government. Perpetu, which first launched in April, is currently part of Hong Kong Cyberport‘s incubator and has received a total of $630,000 HKD (about $81,000 USD) in seed funding from the program. So far, none of Perpetu’s 1,000 registered users have passed away, which means its founders are still able to glean feedback about features from them. Perpetu’s early adopters asked for Dropbox and Instagram support, which is why the startup decided to launch a premium service. Getting users to sign up for the site’s free service has not been a problem, even though dying is a topic most people don’t want to confront. Perpetu’s site was designed so it doesn’t look “too dark or depressing,” Lai says. The service is also much easier than finding a lawyer and drafting a will. Making sure you are really, really dead On the other hand, deleting online accounts is sometimes too easy, as demonstrated by a January Buzzfeed article titled “How To Murder Your Friends On Facebook.” To avoid accidents and pranks, Perpetu has several safeguards in place to verify a user’s death before it starts deactivating accounts. When you sign up, you provide contact information including your email, phone number and the beneficiaries listed on your will, if you have one. When Perpetu learns of your death, it will send an email to you (or your inbox, rather), then call you to make sure that reports of your death have not been greatly exaggerated. You can also set an amount of time to elapse after your death before Perpetu starts following your instructions. Lai says the company is looking at other ways of verifying deaths in different countries, such as checking with government agencies. R.I.P. data? Though Perpetu gives you a certain amount of control over your online legacy, there are also things it cannot do. For example, Perpetu can’t ensure that Facebook or other online services will permanently wipe your data from their servers. Lai also emphasizes that Perpetu is not meant to replace a final will. “We can carry out online wishes for our users through an online mechanism, but if they have a will and the will contradicts Perpetu’s instructions, then of course the will overrides it,” she says. The company wants to work with lawyers and legal firms to encourage people to mention Perpetu accounts in their wills. What Perpetu can do is give you more control over what people can or can’t see on your profiles after you die. “What we want to focus on is that you have so much you have created in your life. There’s value in those creations,” says Lai. “When people start leaving final wishes, they reflect on what they can do in life.”

LPs Are Coming Back To Tech — Just Eat Investor Vitruvian Raises $1.6Bn For Fund 2


In the tech startup world, Vitruvian Partners – an independent private equity firm that specialises in middle-market buyouts, growth buyouts and growth capital investments in the UK and Northern Europe – is best known for its investment last year in online fast food ordering growth-stage startup Just Eat. That fund raise – led by Vitruvian – totalled $64 million and was joined by Index Ventures, Greylock Partners and Redpoint Ventures. And clearly the Limited Partners who back Vitruvian like what it does – in terms of doubling down on growth with startups that are clearly showing significant traction in revenues, as Just Eat did pretty much from the word go. Because today it is announcing the closure of the fundraising of its second fund, Vitruvian Investment Partnership II (“VIP II”), at its self imposed cap of £1 billion ($1.6 billion; €1.2billion). Vitruvian’s first fund was closed in 2008 with commitments of €925 million. The firm says this second fund attracted “substantial commitments” from both existing and new investors. Who are they? Well, the usual suspects, from corporate and state pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, fund of funds, endowments and foundations across Europe, the US, the Middle East and Australasia. Thus, in aggregate, Vetruvian is one of largest growth funds in Europe. Vitruvian will now “continue to invest in partnership with entrepreneurial management teams in ‘dynamic situations’ characterised by growth and change in industries such as business services, information technology, media, telecoms, financial services and healthcare. How much will they invest? They are looking at £25 million to £125 million in companies with enterprise values of £40 million to £250 million. Mike Risman, one of the Managing Partners and Founders of Vitruvian, commented: “We would like to thank the entrepreneurs, management teams and investors…. with whom we have partnered in our first fund.” One industry observer who wished to remain off the record commented that this fund raise now sends the signal that LPs are “back in the game” and far more upbeat about technology as an investment class than in previous years. It also speaks to the fact that Vitruvian has gained a reputation as very much a partner alongside VC firms rather than a competitor. Vitruvian has offices in London, Munich and Stockholm

Microsoft Closes At $38.94, Its Highest Point In 13.38 Years


Microsoft’s stock closed at $38.94 this afternoon, a level that the company hasn’t seen since 2000. As Dow Jones noted today, the last day that Microsoft managed to close above $38.49 was July 18, 2000, when it wrapped up the day’s trading at $39.25. Since then, Microsoft essentially mucked about in the $20s and low $30s, kicking out an endless stream of dividends. It’s worth remembering that the company did split its stock 2:1 in February of 2003. We’re using post-split numbers to allow for an apples:apples comparison. Irony abounds in today’s essentially record high for Microsoft. CEO Steve Ballmer took the reins at Microsoft in January of 2000. He had been president of the company since 1998, helping to oversee Microsoft’s massive run through the end of the millennium. When Ballmer did put on the CEO mantle, he did so essentially at the moment that the technology bubble burst, something that knocked Microsoft down several pegs in quick order. In the final moments of 1999, Microsoft spiked as high as $58 per share. By the end of 2000, Microsoft would trade under the $22 mark. Ballmer’s fault? No. That correction was coming to whomever was sitting atop the Microsoft org chart. The irony begins now: As Ballmer is preparing to step down as CEO, the stock price of the company he has led for so long has returned to the level that it was just seven months into his long tenure. Microsoft is currently worth $325 billion. Google, by way of comparison, is worth $353 billion, and Apple is worth $508 billion. Microsoft has had a very big year, with its stock rising now a total of 45.79 percent in the period. Yahoo also celebrated a landmark moment today, closing above $38 per share for the first time since 2006. This year has been something of a comeback year for a number of classic technology companies. You’ll note that Microsoft and Yahoo had to dramatically reform their businesses to be rewarded by investors for their progress. There’s a lesson there.

CanOpener Tweaks Your iPhone's Audio and Improves the Sound


iOS: Your iPhone doesn't come with a way to really tweak the sound you get. You can change the volume and balance, but that's about it. CanOpener is an app that allows you to tweak to your heart's content so you can get better audio all around. CanOpener gives you a ton of options to really tweak your audio so you can make your music sound exactly like you want. You can tweak the crossfeed to get a bigger, natural sound, tweak equalizer settings to adjust your highs and lows, change loudness, and just about everything else. If that's all a little too much for you, most popular headphones have a preset in CanOpener to get you started. Overall, there's definitely an improvement to the sound quality, although how much you'll notice (or care) really depends on how willing you are to tweak the settings for a few minutes. You do have to use CanOpener as your music app here as well, but it does the job even though it doesn't have a ton of features. CanOpener ($2.99) | iTunes App Store

How to Have Great Ideas More Often, According to Science


Ah, ideas. Who doesn't want more great ideas? I know I do. I usually think about ideas as being magical and hard to produce. I expect them to just show up without me cultivating them, and I often get frustrated when they don't show up when I need them. The good news is that it turns out cultivating ideas is a process, and one that we can practice to produce more (and hopefully better) ideas. This post originally appeared on Buffer. On the other hand, often times great ideas just come to us while in the shower or in another relaxing environment. Let's take a look at the science of the creative process. How Our Brains Work Creatively So far, science hasn't really determined exactly what happens in our brains during the creative process, since it really combines a whole bunch of different brain processes. And, contrary to popular belief, it includes both sides of our brains working together, rather than just one or the other. The truth is, our brain hemispheres are inextricably connected. The two sides of our brains are simply distinguished by their different processing styles. The idea that people can be "right brain thinkers" or "left brain thinkers" is actually a myth that I've debunked before: The origins of this common myth came from some 1960s research on patients whose corpus callosum (the band of neural fibers that connect the hemispheres) had been cut as a last-resort treatment for epilepsy. This removed the natural process of cross-hemisphere communication, and allowed scientists to conduct experiments on how each hemisphere worked in isolation. Unless you've had this procedure yourself, or had half of your brain removed, you're not right or left brained.
We do have a rough idea of how these processes might work, though. The Three Areas of the Brain Used for Creative Thinking Among all the networks and specific centers in our brains, there are three that are known for being used in creative thinking. The Attentional Control Network helps us with laser focus on a particular task. It's the one that we activate when we need to concentrate on complicated problems or pay attention to a task like reading or listening to a talk. The Imagination Network as you might have guessed, is used for things like imagining future scenarios and remembering things that happened in the past. This network helps us to construct mental images when we're engaged in these activities. The Attentional Flexibility Network has the important role of monitoring what's going on around us, as well as inside our brains, and switching between the Imagination Network and Attentional Control for us. You can see the Attentional Control Network (in green) and the Imagination Network (in red) in the image below.
A recent review by Rex Junge and colleagues explained what they think might be happening in our brains when we get creative. It generally involves reducing activation of the Attentional Control Network. Reducing this partially helps us to allow inspiration in, and new ideas to form. The second part is increasing the activation of the Imagination and Attentional Flexibility Networks. Research on jazz musicians and rappers who were improvising creative work on the spot showed that when they enter that coveted flow state of creativity, their brains were exhibiting these signs. Producing New Ideas Is a Process In his book A Technique for Producing Ideas, James Webb Young explains that while the process for producing new ideas is simple enough to explain, "it actually requires the hardest kind of intellectual work to follow, so that not all who accept it use it." He also explains that working out where to find ideas is not the solution to finding more of them, but rather we need to train our minds in the process of producing new ideas naturally. The Two General Principles of Ideas James describes two principles of the production of ideas, which I really like: 1. An idea is nothing more or less than a new combination of old elements. 2. The capacity to bring old elements into new combinations depends largely on the ability to see relationships. This second one is really important in producing new ideas, but it's something our minds need to be trained in. To help our brains get better at delivering good ideas to us, we need to do some preparation first. Let's take a look at what it takes to prime our brains for idea-generation. Preparing to Get New Ideas Since ideas are made from finding relationships between existing elements, we need to collect a mental inventory of these elements before we can start connecting them. James also notes in his book how we often approach this process incorrectly: Instead of working systematically at the job of gathering raw material we sit around hoping for inspiration to strike us. Preparing your brain for the process of making new connections takes time and effort. We need to get into the habit of collecting information that's all around us so our brains have something to work with. James offers a couple of ideas in his book, such as using index cards to organize and distill information into bite-sized pieces. Another suggestion is to use a scrapbook or file, and cross-index everything so you can find what you need, when you need it. Bringing it All Together The hard work is mostly in gathering the materials your brain needs to form new connections, but you can do a lot to help your brain process all of this information, as well. In a paper by neuroscientist Dr. Mark Beeman, he explains how we come to our final "aha" moment of producing an idea, by way of other activities: A series of studies have used electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the neural correlates of the "Aha! moment" and its antecedents. Although the experience of insight is sudden and can seem disconnected from the immediately preceding thought, these studies show that insight is the culmination of a series of brain states and processes operating at different time scales. I love the way that John Cleese talks about these aspects of creativity and how our minds work. He gave an excellent talk years ago about how our brains develop ideas and solve creative problems, wherein he discussed the idea of our brains being like tortoises. Here's how I explained his theory when I wrote about it earlier this year: The idea is that your creativity acts like a tortoise—poking its head out nervously to see if the environment is safe before it fully emerges. Thus, you need to create a tortoise enclosure—an oasis amongst the craziness of modern life—to be a safe haven where your creativity can emerge. He offers a couple of useful ideas to help you achieve this, as well: Set Aside Time John says your thoughts need time to settle down before your creativity will feel safe enough to emerge and get to work. Setting aside time to think regularly can be a good way to train your mind to relax, eventually making this set time a safe haven for your tortoise mind to start putting together connections that could turn into ideas. Find a Creative Space Setting aside time regularly sends a signal to your brain that it's safe to work on creative ideas. Finding a particular space to be creative in can help, too. This is similar to the research on how the temperature and noise around us affects our creativity. Let Your Brain Do the Work This may be one of the hardest, yet most important parts of the process of producing ideas. I think James Webb Young says it best: Drop the whole subject and put it out of your mind and let your subconscious do its thing. Something else John Cleese talks about is how beneficial it can be to "sleep on a problem." He recalls observing a dramatic change in his approach to a creative problem after having left it alone. He not only awoke with a perfectly clear idea on how to continue his work, but the problem itself was no longer apparent. The trick here is to trust enough to let go. As we engage our conscious minds in other tasks, like sleeping or taking a shower, our subconscious can go to work on finding relationships in all the data we've collected so far. The A-Ha Moment James Webb Young explains the process of producing ideas in stages. Once we've completed the first three, which include gathering material and letting our subconscious process the data and find connections, he says we'll come to an "Aha!" moment, when a great idea hits us: It will come to you when you are least expecting it—while shaving, or bathing, or most often when you are half awake in the morning. It may waken you in the middle of the night. How to Have More Great Ideas Understanding the process our brains go through to produce ideas can help us to replicate this, but there are a few things we can do to nudge ourselves towards having better ideas, too. Don't Accept Your Ideas Immediately The final stage of James's explanation of idea production is to criticize your ideas: Do not make the mistake of holding your idea close to your chest at this stage. Submit it to the criticism of the judicious. James says this will help you to expand on the idea and uncover possibilities you might have otherwise overlooked. Here it's especially important to know whether you're introverted or extroverted to criticize your ideas from the right perspective. Overwhelm Your Brain Surprisingly, you can actually hit your brain with more than it can handle and it will step up to the task. Robert Epstein explained in a Psychology Today article how challenging situations can bring out our creativity. Even if you don't succeed at whatever you're doing, you'll wake up the creative areas of your brain and they'll perform better after the failed task, to compensate. Have More Bad Ideas to Have More Good Ones It turns out that having a lot of bad ideas also means you'll have a lot of good ideas. Studies have proved this at both MIT and the University of California Davis. The sheer volume of ideas produced by some people means that they can't help having ots of bad ones, but they're likely to have more good ones, as well. Seth Godin wrote about how important it is to be willing to produce a lot of bad ideas, saying that people who have lots of ideas like entrepreneurs, writers and musicians all fail far more often than they succeed, but they fail less than those who have no ideas at all. He summed this up with an example that I love: Someone asked me where I get all my good ideas, explaining that it takes him a month or two to come up with one and I seem to have more than that. I asked him how many bad ideas he has every month. He paused and said, "none."

Study Shows the Benefits of a Brisk Walk Over a Slow One


We all know that walking is one of the easiest things you can do to keep yourself healthy, but if you want to increase those benefits without a lot of work, The New York Times suggests picking up the pace. It has generally been assumed that walking, no matter how fast, is beneficial. If you're walking slowly, you just need to walk further to get the same benefits as someone walking at a pace of around 15 minutes per mile. However, according to one large scale study, it looks like the pace might actually matter more than we initially though: Unexpectedly, the death rate remained high among the slowest walkers, even if they met or exceeded the standard exercise guidelines and expended as much energy per day as someone walking briskly for 30 minutes. This effect was most pronounced among the slowest of the slow walkers, whose pace was 24 minutes per mile or higher. They were 44 percent more likely to have died than walkers who moved faster, even if they met the exercise guidelines. One important inference of these statistics is that intensity matters, if you are walking for health. "Our results do suggest that there is a significant health benefit to pursuing a faster pace," Dr. Williams said. Pushing your body, he said, appears to cause favorable physiological changes that milder exercise doesn't replicate. The solution? Walk faster: So check yours, your spouse's or perhaps your parents' pace. The process is easy. Simply find a 400-meter track and, using a stopwatch, have everyone walk at his or her normal speed. If a circuit of the track takes someone 6 minutes or more, that person's pace is 24 minutes per mile or slower, and he or she might consider consulting a doctor about possible health issues, Dr. Williams said. So, maybe even when you're not in a hurry it's worth picking up the pace a bit to get where you're going.